Every yard has had this conversation.
Is it better to run older machinery that’s fully paid for, or invest in new equipment with higher finance costs but greater efficiency and reliability?
There’s no universal right answer. What works perfectly for one farmer or contractor may be completely wrong for another. But when you look beyond purchase price alone, the decision becomes far more interesting.
At first glance, older machinery often looks like the obvious winner.
Good, well maintained, used equipment typically carries:
For many businesses, that means cheaper hourly running costs….at least on paper.
However, newer machinery introduces something increasingly valuable in modern farming; cost certainty.
With finance agreements, service plans and warranty cover, many costs become predictable and easier to budget. In an industry already exposed to fluctuating inputs such as fuel, fertiliser, labour and weather, fixing machinery costs can provide real financial stability.
For contractors especially, predictable overheads make working out the cost per bale/ha or hour far easier.
Take your typical silage baling operation as an example.
Option 1: Used Separate Machines
Two non-combination round balers supported by a wrapper system can often be purchased for significantly less than modern combination units.
Advantages include:
But this setup typically requires:
Option 2: New Combination Balers
New baler / wrapper combinations (such as Fusion type machines) reduce labour requirements and simplify operations.
Benefits include:
However:
Perhaps the most important factor isn’t machinery cost at all, it’s throughput.
How many bales can you produce per hour?
In many situations:
When conditions change quickly (as they often do here in Ireland), output during short harvesting windows becomes critical.
Efficiency isn’t always about having fewer machines. Sometimes it’s about having enough machines working simultaneously.
Machinery decisions today are increasingly influenced by labour availability.
Questions farmers now face include:
There’s also a cultural reality; many younger operators prefer modern machinery. Comfortable cabs, automation and easier controls can make recruitment and retention easier.
Older machines may be cheaper, but only if you have people willing and able to run them.
Older machinery generally brings:
New machinery typically delivers:
During peak silage season, downtime carries its own hidden cost and risk. A machine stopped in good weather can quickly become more expensive than any finance repayments; and is often forgotten by many farmers when calculating their expenditure and their ‘cost per bale’.
Modern balers also introduce technologies not available on older equipment.
Examples include:
While NRF systems aim to simplify recycling streams, they can introduce operational limitations, particularly when transporting or feeding bales before opening.
By comparison, traditional netwrap or newer systems such as EZ Web, maintain flexibility, allowing bales to be safely handled or moved prior to feeding.
Another often overlooked factor is operator time.
Consider:
Across thousands of bales per season, even small interruptions quickly accumulate into significant amounts of lost productivity.
The honest answer is that efficiency depends entirely on the business.
For some farms:
For others:
The most efficient setup is not necessarily the newest or the cheapest, but the one that best matches:
Used machinery offers affordability and flexibility. New machinery offers predictability and performance.
Successful operators increasingly focus less on age and more on system efficiency; ensuring machinery, labour and output all work together when it matters most.
Because in baling season, the real cost isn’t the machine in the yard……it’s the crop left waiting in the field.
Subscribe to Tama News for practical baling tips, real farmer insights, and the latest advice, straight to your inbox each month.